Reply to “Comments on ‘Why Hasn't Earth Warmed as Much as Expected?’”
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Reply to ‘‘Comments on ‘Why Hasn’t Earth Warmed as Much as Expected?’’’
Knutti and Plattner (2012, hereinafter KP) wholly mischaracterize the ‘‘warming discrepancy’’ that we presented in our paper (Schwartz et al. 2010, hereinafter S10). Briefly, we noted that the calculated increase in global temperature due to long-lived greenhouse gases (LLGHGs) alone greatly exceeds the observed warming. We then examined possible causes of this discrepancy, importantly, thermal...
متن کاملWhy Hasn’t Earth Warmed as Much as Expected?
The observed increase in global mean surface temperature (GMST) over the industrial era is less than 40% of that expected from observed increases in long-lived greenhouse gases together with the best-estimate equilibrium climate sensitivity given by the 2007 Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Possible reasons for this warming discrepancy are systematically exami...
متن کاملReply to “ Comments on
Kopitzki et al (preceeding comment) claim that the relationship between Renormalized and Kullback-Leibler entropies has already been given in their previous papers. Moreover, they argue that the first can give more useful information for e.g. localizing the seizure-generating area in epilepsy patients. In our reply we stress that if the relationship between both entropies would have been known ...
متن کاملWhy technology matters as much as science in improving healthcare
BACKGROUND More than half a million new items of biomedical research are generated every year and added to Medline. How successful are we at applying this steady accumulation of scientific knowledge and so improving the practice of medicine in the USA? DISCUSSION The conventional wisdom is that the US healthcare system is plagued by serious cost, access, safety and quality weaknesses. A compr...
متن کاملReply to Comments on Reflections
There are three main criticisms. The first is to misread Assumption 1 so as to think that probabilities are being put to zero after having observed the data leading to the erroneous conclusion that the proposed methods are not Bayesian. The second is due to a failure to grasp the relevance of the fifth paragraph of the Introduction leading to suggestions that alternative methods be used that ar...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Climate
سال: 2012
ISSN: 0894-8755,1520-0442
DOI: 10.1175/2011jcli4161.1